Answer:
Null Hypothesis: H0:μ ≤ 16.8
Alternative Hypothesis: Ha: μ > 16.8
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told that affer testing the hypothesis (at the 5% level of significance), that the average price-earnings ratio increased from the past value of 16.8.
It means that the past value was not more than 16.8.
This follows that the null hypothesis is given as;
H0:μ ≤ 16.8
And since it has been discovered that the ratio increased from the past value of 16.8, the alternative hypothesis is;
Ha: μ > 16.8
We can solve this by writing down all of the variables we know. We will call the distance traveled on Saturday, x. The distance traveled on Sunday will be y.
x = distance traveled saturday
y = distance traveled sunday
We are told that on sunday he rode 3 miles more than 2/3 the distance on saturday. We can write a new formula.
y = (2/3)x + 3
We also not the total distance travelled, x + y = 43, now we solve for x.
x + y = 43
x + (2/3)x + 3 = 43
5/3x = 40
x = 24 miles
y = (2/3)(24)+3
y = 19 miles
Therefore, Mario biked 24 miles on Saturday and 19 miles on Sunday which gives us the total of 43 miles for the whole weekend.
Answer:
-25/8 and then -6/6 then 0/7 then 2 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
20 Cars on the bridge
60% of 20 ＝ 12 Passenger Car
12×1.00＝$12
20-12＝8 Other Vehicles
8×2.75＝$22
12+22＝$34
So expected revenue is $34
The lamp is about 90 cm. to get this answer you take 36 and multiply it by 2.5.
