Answer:
The correct option is B
(-1)(1/2)(-1)(1)
Step-by-step explanation:
First thing to notice is that there is are two brackets with negative values, which means that the result must also be positive (or have two brackets with negative values).
Looking at the options, we can screen out options A and D, they have three brackets with negative values, and can't be chosen.
It is now between options B and C.
Option B, by inspection is simply 1/2
Option C is 12/4 = 3
The problem itself is 12/35
12/24 = 1/2
12/36 = 1/3
Since 12/35 is about 1/3, it is closer to 1/2 than 3, so 1/2 is the best option.
We have the following equation:
<span> h(t)=-4.92t^2+17.69t+575
</span> For the domain we have:
<span> </span>We match zero:
-4.92t ^ 2 + 17.69t + 575 = 0
We look for the roots:
t1 = -9.16
t2 = 12.76
We are left with the positive root, so the domain is:
[0, 12.76]
For the range we have:
We derive the function:
h '(t) = - 9.84t + 17.69
We equal zero and clear t:
-9.84t + 17.69 = 0
t = 17.69 / 9.84
t = 1.80
We evaluate the time in which it reaches the maximum height in the function:
h (1.80) = - 4.92 * (1.80) ^ 2 + 17.69 * (1.80) +575
h (1.80) = 590.90
Therefore, the range is given by:
[0, 590.9]
Answer:
the domain and range are:
domain: [0, 12.76] range: [0, 590.9]
Answer:
I believe the answer may be x= 24.5 I'm not certain though
Step-by-step explanation:
The angles inside the triangle must all add up to 180 so we can subtract 80 from 180 to get 98. Now I'm assuming the two undefined angles are equal because of the two angle bisectors that create the second triangle. If I'm correct in assuming that them we can divided 98 by 2 to get 49 which would be the measurement of both bottom angles. Since there's a line bisecting both of them we would then cut that number in half to get 24.5. I hope this helped, I'm not fully certain of this answer though.
You solve the substitution method to solve a system of equality by expressing one variable in terms of the other using one equation, and then plugging this expression in the other(s).
In this case, the first equation gives us a way to express n in terms of m. So, we can replace every occurrence of n in the second equation with the given formula.
The result is

So, the second equation turned to be an equality, i.e. an equation where both sides are the same.
This implies that the system has infinitely many solutions, because every couple
such that
is a solution to the system, because it satisfies both equations: the first is trivially satisfied, whereas the second is an identity, and as such is satisfied by any value of the variable.
<u>Prove that:</u>

<u>Proof: </u>
We know that, by Law of Cosines,
<u>Taking</u><u> </u><u>LHS</u>
<em>Substituting</em> the value of <em>cos A, cos B and cos C,</em>



<em>On combining the fractions,</em>

<em>Regrouping the terms,</em>



LHS = RHS proved.