Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.
This BEST illustrates the value of Positive reinforcement.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
When a person is rewarded something for doing certain tasks it refers to Positive reinforcement. This is given because for rewards that person will be doing these actions. The rewards that are given for their actions acts as a a reinforcing stimulus. For instance consider that a dad gives his daughter some gifts for doing some actions or for good deeds.
In the given example, the project that has been completed by you by working day and nights and you receive a bonus cheque from your boss after two weeks. This acts as a reward for your work and motivates you to further work happily. This bets illustrates the value of Positive reinforcement.
Answer:
$183,600
Explanation:
Since the expected useful life of the patent is only 10 years, instead of 20 years, its cost should be amortized in 10 years. That means that for every year that passes, Northern has to amortize $20,400 (= $204,000 / 10). Only one year passed between September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018, so the patent's account on the balance sheet is $183,600 (= $204,000 - $20,400).
Answer: 83.53 days.
Explanation:
We would need to calculate the Current Assets as well as the Quick Assets.
Calculating the Current Assets we can use the Current ratio and Current Liabilities as follows,
Current Assets = Current Ratio * Current Liabilities
= 1.22 * 28,000
= $34,160
Then we calculate the Quick Assets which are essentially the most liquid assets being Cash and Cash Equivalents,
= Quick Ratio * Current Liabilities
= 0.71 * 28,000
= $19,880
Inventory will be Current Assets minus Quick Assets because Current Assets include all Current Assets whereas Quick Assets are Cash And Cash Equivalents Current Assets
= 34,160 - 19,880
= $14,280
We can then calculate the Inventory Turnover as,
= Cost of Goods sold / Inventory
= 62,400/14,280
= 4.36974789916 times.
Now we can finally calculate the days of Inventory by dividing the days in a year by the Turnover ratio. We will assume a 365 year.
= 365/4.36974789916
= 83.53 days.
It takes 83.53 days on average does it take to sell the inventory.
