Answer:
Customers require value for money.
Explanation:
Total Quality Management TQM is an approach to make the product best for its customers and work towards customer satisfaction. Customers demands may be different, some customers require value for money while others just go for brand image. Some customers like online shopping while other prefer buying the product after watching its specs. The motive of a business is to satisfy the needs of all of its customers. Coca Cola beverages company has also focused on satisfying its customers. It responds to the various flavor requirements by its customers and has introduced more than 5 flavored drinks. The quality of any drink is not compromised and it aims to provide value for money to its customers.
Answer:
$8,343
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How much did Yasmin earn from this transaction
First step to calculate the Total commission from sale
Total commission from sale= ($463,500 × 0.06)
Total commission from sale=$27,810
Second step is to calculate Yasmin's firm's share
Yasmin's firm's share= ($27,810 ÷ 2)
Yasmin's firm's share=$13,905
Now let calculate How much did Yasmin earn from this transaction
Yasmin's Earning = ($13,905 × 0.60)
Yasmin's Earning=$8,343
Therefore the amount that Yasmin earn from this transaction is $8,343
Answer:
B. Less than 10%
Explanation:
An addition increase by 10 % in the physical capital stock (which is a factor of production consisting of man made goods like machineries and so on) will lead to a less than 10% increase in the Gross domestic product. This is due to the law of diminishing marginal utility which talks about the consumption increases marginal utility from each additional unit declines. Thus, the more the physical capital stock increases, the GDP will increase at a decreasing rate.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer: Option B
Explanation: Opportunity cost refers to the of loss of profit when an individual or firm chooses one alternative over other.
The statement in the given case, depicts the opportunity cost one has to pay of using the scarce resources that could be sued on different alternatives.
The lunch is never free depicts that one could have used it in other alternatives that may have produced some economic benefits.
Hence, the correct option is B.
