Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
Answer: $0.79.
Explanation:
Given that,
Tendered bill = $5
Bill charged = $4.21
Therefore,
The change due is calculated by subtracting bill charged from tendered bill.
Change due = Tendered bill - Bill charged
= $5 - $4.21
= $0.79
Hence, change in dollars would be $0.79.
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
They are easier to buy and sell than other forms of investment. When they say an asset is liquid, it means it can easily be turned or converted to cash. Liquid stocks and bonds are easier to sell and buy because they will be see a buyer and seller to pay in exchange for cash.
Illiquid means they are difficult to sell and buy or they are difficult to be converted to cash
Answer: C. MortgageMax may pay the counseling fees, but is prohibited from steering Jenny towards a particular counselor or allowing her to complete counseling from one of its affiliates.
Explanation:
MortgageMax is violating the law in recommending a particular counselor and recommending one of its affiliates. Lenders are not allowed to direct a loan candidate to a certain counselor in order to avoid any unfortunate situations that arise from the counselor being partial to the lender.
Lenders are also prohibited from offering the counselling via an affiliate for the same reason above. They are however, allowed to pay for the counselling.
