Answer:
the first blank is 100
the second is 80
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x<0.5
Step-by-step explanation:
this is just like simplifiying equations if you've done that before
first you want to isolate the variable, so you want to combine the values of x (in this case it's 6x and the -2x)
so you can either add 2x to both sides or you can subtract 6x on both sides, in this case ill just add 2x to both sides.
Then you subtract 3 from both sides to get 8x<4
after you get that, you want to divide both sides by 8, and you generally want to do that step last, it makes it easier, and you get x<1/2 or 0.5
just a reminder that with working with inequalities, you want to remember to flip the direction the inequality is whenever you divide by a negative number
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
3601
-589
———-
To
359(11)
-589
———-
3012
Step-by-step explanation:
