This small group is the "chronic 6%," a term used to refer to Chronic Juvenile/Delinquent Offenders.
What characterizes these juveniles is that they do not typically "grow out" of criminal behavior. Rather, they continue as adults. Out of all delinquent conduct, a large number of offences is attributed to these youths.
The term "chronic" in this context means that they repeatedly break the law over a long period of time.
A) species, cause if you’re a alien or human you’re still 1 species
The answer is<u> "reference".</u>
The Semantic Triangle demonstrates the immediate connection between Words and Thoughts and Thoughts and Thing. Yet, the specked lines speak to the word (sign) isn't the Thing (a referent) and there is no any immediate connection among words and thing. The referent needs some related knowledge and reference about the word or sign to be complete.
The word implies diverse things to various individuals in various circumstances. Any sign or word which has its own particular significance is gotten a handle on with specific references to it. The way toward getting a handle on or understanding words or signs, which as of now have importance, with the affirmed implications given by the references is known as the significance of importance.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the political cartoon. Without the cartoon, we do not know what is its content.
However, trying to help you, we did some deep research and can comment on the following.
This cartoon depicts a hammer and an anvil. White hands are holding the hammer that is hitting a chain. A black arm is chained. So the white hands using the hammer are hitting the chains, breaking them. The hammer has a legend that says "Supreme Court Decision." The chain says "segregated schools."
So the purpose and symbolism of the cartoon of 1954 are the following. It refers to the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka of 1954 case. The Court ruled that segregation in public schools was unequal and was unconstitutional. The Court concluded that in public education “separated buy equal” was not correct. It was a major accomplishment for black people in those years.
