Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. recognizing that there is a problem or opportunity.
Public property is owned by <u>the government</u>. Businesses or people who own property have <em>private property</em>.
He tells John that he would like the "experiment" (of John living in London society) to continue. In other words, he is interested in continuing to experiment with John's life at John's expense.
Answer:
ang simbolismo ay isang bagay na nagsisimbolo ng isang pangyayari, o bagay
halimbawa: kalapati = kapayapaan. ang kalapati ang simbolismo dahil isinisimbolo nya ang kapayapaan
ang pahiwatig naman ay salita o pangungusap na may itinatagong kahulugan. Itoy salitang hindi natin maintindihan para itong sawikain o salawikain at kailangan nating hanapin ang kahulugan nito
halimbawa
hindi na sya babalik kailanman = patay na sya
ang hindi na sya babalik kailanman ay pahiwatig ng patay na ito
