There are different kinds of cases. The answers to the questions are blow.
- Before any court can hear any dispute between Miriam and the trucking company, it must have the jurisdiction to do so.
- In order for Marya to sue the trucking firm, she has to file the lawsuit in a court that also has personal jurisdiction over the <u>Defendant</u>.
- Georgia and Florida have personal jurisdiction over the trucking firm?
Yes, Marya sue the trucking firm in Georgia and Florida state courts.
Miriam would likely NOT want to sue the trucking firm in Georgia because she would need to;
- Get a lawyer in Georgia
- Make multiple trips to Georgia
- Have witnesses travel to Georgia.
Miriam would likely want to sue the trucking firm in Florida because:
1. The court is closer to her home
2. She can better research for local lawyers
- Miriam can sue the trucking firm in a federal trial court because residents of different states.
<h3>What takes place in a court case?</h3>
In a trial done in a court, lawyers often present evidence via witnesses who are known to testify about what they have seen or known.
After all the evidence had been presented, the lawyers will then give their closing arguments and lastly, the jury then decides if the defendant is guilty or not guilty.
Learn more about jurisdiction from
brainly.com/question/681072
Answer:
The term professional communication refers to the various forms of speaking, listening, writing, and responding carried out both in and beyond the workplace, whether in person or electronically.
Explanation:
Answer:
benefits consumers of the product.
Explanation:
Import tariffs are generally put in place to protect domestic producers from foreign producers. Tariffs benefit domestic producers but hurt consumers since they are forced to pay higher prices.
When the import tariffs are withdrawn, the domestic price of the goods should decrease, benefiting consumers.
Macroeconomics deals with the short-run variations in economic growth that make up the business cycle
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Macroeconomics?</h3>
Generally, The study of an economy's performance overall, structure, behavior, and judgment is the domain of macroeconomics, a subfield within the discipline of economics.
The increase of economic activity is followed by periods of contraction, which together make up a business cycle.
These shifts have repercussions not just for the well-being of the general population but also for the operations of private organizations.
Business cycles are a sort of variation that may be observed in the overall economic activity of a country.
A business cycle is a cycle that consists of expansions happening at about the same time in numerous economic activities, followed by contractions that are equally widespread in nature.
In conclusion, The business cycle is the primary focus of macroeconomics, which analyzes the short-term fluctuations in economic growth that occur throughout it.
Read more about Macroeconomics
brainly.com/question/28424197
#SPJ1
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
