Answer:
Yes, Hazel needs to pay extra $700
Explanation:
As per pre-existing duty rule, a person is obligated to perform his duty at the consideration agreed upon initially. Any modification to the contract is void.
Exceptions to this rule:
- As per new contract, if the person undertaking his duty hires another person to perform the work so as to complete it in time, then modifications are valid and enforceable.
- Modifications are valid in case of unforeseen contingencies like war, recession, change in economic conditions and strikes.
In this case, Hazel agreed to pay $700 extra. Under pre-existing duty rule, she is not required to pay Eugene extra $700 but since Eugene took additional help exception to the rule applies and Hazel is obligated to pay $700 extra.
<span>The rate for the general population was 37.5 percent. This is for people who do not work to make their heart function at the optimal level and take other preventative actions to make sure that they can lower their risk of heart attack or other cardiac issues to a minimum.</span>
Answer:
<u>Journal 1</u>
Debit : Prepaid Expense $37,600
Credit : Cash $18,800
Credit : Insurance Expense $18,800
<u>Journal 2</u>
Debit : Dividends $18,000
Credit : Wages $18,000
Explanation:
Journal 1
The first error has to be corrected by debiting the Prepaid Expenses by twice the amount paid to cancel the effect of a credit entry made to that account. Cash is credited to show the correct credit entry that was supposed to be made. Insurance expense is credited to cancel the debit entry made to this account in error.
Journal 2
The error made is called error of principle. This is were the transaction is recorded in the wrong class of accounts. Simply, Debit the Dividends and credit the Wages Account to record and reverse the error out of the Wages Account into the Dividends Account.
Answer:
d. $5,000
Explanation:
Patnode's information is missing, so I looked it up. I found the balance sheet for 2014 and 2015. Hope that it is the same question:
total depreciation expense for 2015 = change in accumulated depreciation (2015 - 2014) + change in accumulated amortization (2015 - 2014) = ($3,000 - $0) + ($3,000 - $1,000) = $3,000 + $2,000 = $5,000
Answer:
The correct option is b. The income from continuing operations is $1141000.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the tax rate is 30% while the income before income taxes was $1,630,000 which means that the The income from continuing operations is $1141000 calculated as:
Income from continuing operations=[$1,630,000-(30%*$1,630,000)]
Income from continuing operations=$1,630,000-$489,000
Income from continuing operations=$1,141,000
