Keep a copy so you have a record of the communication.
Answer:
tall - towering
happy - cheerful
interesting - fascinating
boring - colorless
Explanation:
<u>It is important, especially when it comes to writing, to have and expanded lexicon so as to avoid repetition or the use of general words. That means we can express the same idea in a more compelling way by simply knowing how to employ more engaging words.</u>
Let's use the words above in sentences. Pay attention to how the sentence sounds different after the change for the more interesting option, even though the words have basically the same meaning:
1. The old tall oak had finally been cut, put to rest without mercy. - The old towering oak had finally been cut, put to rest without mercy.
2. Rosana had always been described as a happy child. - Rosana had always been described as a cheerful child.
3. I have just finished a most interesting book. - I have just finished a most fascinating book.
4. The monotony in his voice made his lecture boring - The monotony in his voice made his lecture colorless.
is there answer choices? if not then I'd say obedient.
Answer:
The Nazi Party rationalized the mass murders through its well-invented propaganda. The massive propaganda was one of the most powerful sources that Nazis used to achieve their goals, so they used it frequently and on different ways.
One of its purpose was to justify the mass murders of Jewish people and their Allies. Nazis described Germany as a victim of Jewish aggression in order to justify their violence against innocent people. Hitler frequently stated that Jewish people and the Allies are spreading awful lies against Nazi Germany and their leadership.
The best example would be their invasion on Poland. Hitler invented Polish attack on a German radio station, under excuse that Germany was defending itself from Polish attacks. He actually tried to rationalize his invasion on Poland.
Hello. You have not submitted the arguments to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for this question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
A persuasive argument is one that has the capacity to convince the reader about something. The author of this argument wants the reader to agree with what he is presenting and for this reason uses several evidences and supporting information to show that the argument is valid, true and that it must be adopted by the reader. Therefore, to answer this question, you must first read the arguments and see which one has less evidence, failing to show that it is correct and that it must be believed. In this case, this argument is the least persuasive.
