Answer:
Kate's possible hourly rate of pay: $34.75
Hours of overtime: 100
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find Kate's hourly wage, we can set up an equation based on the number of hours she works per week and the estimated number of overtime hours to equal her total pay for the year. If Kate works 36 hours/week and there are 52 weeks in a year, her total hours for one year are: 36 x 52 = 1872. Setting up an equation based on her total earnings of $72,000:
1872x + 100(2x) = 72000, where 'x' is the hourly rate and '2x' is her overtime rate which is double time.
Combine like terms: 1872x + 200x = 72000 or 2072x = 72000
Divide both sides by 2072: 2072x/2072 = 72000/2072
Solve for x: x = $34.75
Kate's hourly rate is estimated at $34.75. We can check to see if this is correct by putting this value back into our original equation:
1872(34.75) + 100(2)(34.75) = 65052 + 6950 = 72002
The answer of $72,002 is very close to $72,000 and the best estimate of Kate's hourly wage and overtime hours.
Divide .5 4 then do the rest
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
