Video news release (ignore what im typing in the parenthesis im taking up space)
Answer: D
Explanation:
Behavioral economics studies the impact of cognitive, psychological, cultural, emotional and social factors on individuals economic decisions. Behavioral economics is concerned with the extent of rationality of individuals, firms and governments. The study includes how market choices are made and the components that propel public choices.
Behavioral economics is important because it gives us an idea about how the mind of humans work. The greater the supply of a particular good, the more we use the good, the less we appreciate it. There are oceans of water and we always get water easily but there are fewer diamonds embedded and hidden in rocks which are not cheap and readily available.
The given statement about the reasons why individuals join groups is True.
<h3>What is a Group?</h3>
This refers to the collection of individuals in unison to achieve a set goal or to expand their interests, leveraging on the network of other members.
Hence, we can see that the given statement that Individuals join groups for two primary reasons: to enjoy the company of others and to accomplish goals unattainable by themselves is true.
Read more about interest groups here:
brainly.com/question/14363531
Answer:
The answer is: B) People face trade-offs
Explanation:
A trade-off happens when you have to balance two (or three in this case) opposing situations.
Rina has to decide how to divide the time she can spend training. If she chooses to do one activity, she can´t do the other. So she has to balance the time spent on each activity, probably depending on which sport she needs to train the most.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Judge's own personal feelings about the internet.
Explanation:
When a case comes to a court, it is the responsibility of a judge to see every aspect of the case and analyze it on the basis of given evidence or set rules or standards, or in the light of decisions made on the same case by other courts. But in this question, it is said that the case which was brought to the court was the first in its kind, it means no such type of case has been ever submitted in any court before. The freedom of speech on internet is a sensitive issue. So all aspects should be kept in mind while proceeding the case, and it would not be considered proper for the judge to bring his person feelings about the internet into the case. His personal feelings should be set aside and the case should be solved on the basis of evidences and solid views.
