The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
Well it is a graph or diagram that can show a lot of information and It may convey a point better then just a piece of writing
Answer:
A: $1,475,000
Explanation:
The computation of the overhead applied is shown below:
But before that first determine the predetermined overhead rate which is
= Estimated annual overhead cost ÷ Estimated machine hours
= $1,500,000 ÷ 300,000
= $5
Now the applied overhead is
= Predetermined overhead rate × Actual machine hours
= $5 × 295,000
= $1,475,000
The answer to this question would be: 47%
In 1965, there are just 9% of women that taking medical program but in 2013 the amount is nearly same as the man. The increase is more intense before 1990 which was 40%. It would be 31% increase from 1965. The percentage of the total applicant and the accepted applicant is nearly same, so the increase is mostly done because there are more women applicant in later years.
