The aspect of analyzing teamwork is Chi-Ling using is authority differentiation. Thus the option 3rd is correct.
<h3 /><h3>What is Authority?</h3>
Authority refers to the power access by the individual or the government over the others. The authoritative person can make the decisions regarding the various sectors and make his subordinates to work in his accord.
The Chi ling has divided the work of the accounting and marketing between his employees and made the head of the department. Thus this concept of analyzing the teamwork is known as authority differentiation.
The authority of the both the employees Connor and Manami is well defines they both will looking after their filed and are free to take decisions on their department.
Learn more about teamwork here:
brainly.com/question/18869410
#SPJ1
Answer:
Functional
Explanation:
Functional groups are formed when people with specialised skills are chosen to work together to achieve a goal. Due to similarity in profession team is cohesive and work harmoniously to meet business targets.
Communication is usually done within the department, when another department head needs information he contacts the department head of the unit to get it.
Each employee reports to one manager, so chain of command is simplified.
Starbucks repurchased over $1.4 billion of its common stock in 2015. How did this repurchase affect Starbucks' ROE?
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": in both statements I and II.
Explanation:
(I) According to the demand law, <em>if the price of tea increases the quantity demanded of tea will decrease</em>. If the price of tea decreases, the quantity demanded of tea will increase. Quantity demanded and the price has an inversely proportional relationship in the demand law.
(II) When talking about complementary goods like tea and sugar, <em>if the price of tea increases will result in a negative movement along the demand curve of tea and will cause the demand curve of sugar to move inwards. In such a scenario, the demand for each good will be reduced.</em>
Answer: OPTION A
Explanation: For winning the suit of negligence- duty, breach, cause and damage are the four elements that the plaintiff needs to prove. Intent is not an element of negligence.
Intent, used as a short form for intention, can be defined as the commitment of an individual to do certain action in present or in future period.
