Answer:
The 1st ratio examines debt by observing at the company's balance sheet, whereas the other two ratios examine debt by observing at the company's income statement. Thus, debt-to-total-assets ratio processes the %age of assets delivered by debt in order to fund total assets. The computed equation will be: (Total long term debt + Total short term debt) / Total assets). The high debt ratios that overdo the business average might create it expensive for a company to borrow the extra funds without initial raising for more equity. The period’s interest received ratio processes the degree to which the income can fall before the company is incapable to meet its yearly interest expense expenditures. However, the computed equation is EBIT / total interest payable: EBIT is used as the numerator as it is funded with pretax dollars. The company’s capability to pay will not be affected by the taxes. The EBITDA analysis ratio is EBITDA / total interest: This proportion is more comprehensive than the TIE proportion because it identifies that depreciation and payback are not expenses, so these aggregates are accessible to service debt, and lease expenses and principal refunds are fixed expenses.
The answer in the space provided is the valid questionnaire. It is because a valid questionnaire is a type of questionnaire in which it measures a particular quantity, group or a particular thing that is related to their research. This type of questionnaire enables to promote the validity and reliability. It could be seen above that it is considered to be a valid questionnaire as it tries to measure something that is related to their research in which they will measure the population.
A. i am pretty sure it is A.
Answer:
The statement represents the Straw Man fallacy.
Explanation:
A Straw Man fallacy is a version of an argument that is misrepresented, simplified so that it will be easier to defeat. It replaces or represents whatever actual argument is being made. The Straw Man fallacy in some cases is not provided intentionally. They could also be the result of talking about something with little to no previous knowledge of it.
Thus, as the evolutionary theory does not only proposes that humans come from monkeys with less hair and bigger brains, <em>the statement is oversimplifying the different researches on that topic</em> falling into a Straw Man fallacy.
