Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

14

Part A: Find the LCM of 8 and 9. Show your work. (3 points) Part B: Find the GCF of 35 and 63. Show your work. (3 points) Part C

: Using the GCF you found in Part B, rewrite 35 + 63 as two factors. One factor is the GCF and the other is the sum of two numbers that do not have a common factor. Show your work. (4 points)

1 answer:

GaryK [48]3 years ago

3 0

A: 8*9= 72

B: euclidean theorem (35,63) (35,28) (7,28) (7,0) gcf= 7

C: 7(5+9)

You might be interested in

Factorise fully the following 2x+8

kakasveta [241]

Answer:

it cant be solved

Step-by-step explanation:

please a brainliest please

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Sonia is standing between two buildings. The building to her left is 112 feet tall and the building to her right is 78 feet tall

djverab [1.8K]

I give up on this one because it is so hard

4 0

3 years ago

Before 2017, a smart phone manufacturer's phones had a diagonal length of 5.8 inches and an aspect ratio

zhenek [66]

Answer: They were not correct it was bigger by 2.5 so the people were wrong

6 0

2 years ago

How to solve step by step -3(2x-3)< 3 ?

likoan [24]

-3(2x-3)<3
(-3(2x-3))(-1)<3(-1)
3(2x-3)>-3
(3(2x-3))/3>-3/3
2x-3>-1
2x-3+3>-1+3
2x>2
2x/2>2/2
x>1

5 0

3 years ago

In a Pew Research Center poll of 745 randomly selected adults, 589 said that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax

Nikolay [14]

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p = 0.75$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p \ne 0.75$

b

$t = 2.51$

c

$p-value = 0.01207$

d

There no sufficient evidence to conclude that 75% of adults say that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The sample size is $n = 745$

The number that said it is morally wrong is $k = 589$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

The population proportion is $p = 0.75$

Generally the sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\r p = \frac{k}{n}$

=> $\r p = \frac{589}{745}$

=> $\r p = 0.79$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p = 0.75$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p \ne 0.75$

The standard error is mathematically represented as

$SE = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} }$

=> $SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{745} }$

=> $SE =0.0159$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$t = \frac{\r p - p }{SE}$

=> $t = \frac{0.79 - 0.75 }{0.0159}$

=> $t = 2.51$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 2.51)$

From the the z-table

$P(Z > 2.51) = 0.0060366$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.0060366$

=> $p-value = 0.01207$

From the calculation $p-value >\alpha$

Hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Thus there no sufficient evidence to conclude that 75% of adults say that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns

7 0

3 years ago