Answer:
A. Being easily distracted by events unrelated to one's goal can interfere with goal
Explanation:
Self-regulation includes the process to maintain the stability of the emotions and thoughts, controlling them in the long run, and managing to produce positive results during the actions.
Performance is the second phase of self-regulation and it involves the learning processes. One of the key questions to consider during this phase is are there distractions and how can we get rid of them.
<u>Any distractions during the performance phase can lead to more satisfying effects and usage of more time than it is planned and necessary.</u> Distractions will lower the concentration and with it the control of the performance. <u>This will have negative effects.</u> Therefore,<u> any distractions must be terminated while this phase of self-regulation is taking place.</u>
Answer: It built desalination plants to convert salt water into fresh water.
It imported fresh water from other states where it is more abundant.
It passed laws protecting the state’s scarce fresh water supplies.
It constructed a series of dams and canals to hold and transport water.
- FOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM _IAMNYRI_
HOPE I ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION TO WHERE YOU GET AN A+
One of the most important predictors and components of mathematical achievement has been found by Siegler and colleagues as the skill in placing numbers, including fractions, on a mental number line.
Siegler's theory of these mathematical developments aims to develop strategies to improve children's math learning.
Some of Siegler's studies are aimed at representing children's numbers to identify the learning of whole numbers, fractions and other arithmetic topics.
Therefore, these studies on the development of children's math skills are very useful in identifying why some children are more proficient than others and in identifying the strategies used by children to solve math problems.
Learn more about Siegler here:
brainly.com/question/6367322
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Because we wanted our own country and not have everything ruled by a king across the globe