Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The awnser is 15
hope that was helpful
Answer:
$1.00
hopefuly this helped if not let me know!
Step-by-step explanation:
Question 10 :
3x + 6 = 4x – 12 ( reason: corresponding angles due to parallel lines)
simplify and get x, thus x = 18
to find 3x + 6 or 4x - 12(which is both the same),
3(18) + 6 = 60° , 4(18) - 12 = 60°
Question 11:
2x + 24 + x = 180 ( reason: interior angles due to parallel lines)
simplify again to get x, you will get x = 52
then find the individual by subbing in the value of x into the equation.
so 2x + 24 = 2(52)+24 = 128° and x = 52°
Substitute in y= equation into 2nd equation to start.
(2,5)