The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
Answer:
B) Affluent Europeans buy sugar from merchants in European cities. Millions of people in Africa are kidnapped by African slave traders and sold to European sugarcane planters in the Caribbean.
Explanation:
A consequence is regarded as 'intentional' if the people involved foreseen the consequences of their action.
In option B, many slave traders observed that many Rich Europeans buy sugar from the merchant when they are in European cities.
Seeing this , They foresee an opportunity to profit from this situation. They know that they if they can provide a form of cheap labors for the Europeans, the Europeans will definitely buy them since it can cut down their operational cost in the plantation.
So, they Kidnap people from different continent and offer them as slaves. The slave traders in this situation intentionally conducted the slaves because of economic prediction that is fully intentional.
B it was forces resserrlemat of cherokees to land west of the mississippi
Answer:
Patriot: NO MORE TEA! Loyalist: TEA FOR EVERYONE!
Explanation:
:)
