How many mm equal 14m

A 650 kg car accelerates at 4.0 m/s2 south. what is the net force acting on it?

Lelu [443]

Fnet=mass x acceleration
=650 x 4
=2600N

8 0

4 years ago

A 300 MHz electromagnetic wave in air (medium 1) is normally incident on the planar boundary of a lossless dielectric medium wit

Masja [62]

Answer:

Wavelength of the incident wave in air = 1 m

Wavelength of the incident wave in medium 2 = 0.33 m

Intrinsic impedance of media 1 = 377 ohms

Intrinsic impedance of media 2 = 125.68 ohms

Check the explanation section for a better understanding

Explanation:

a) Wavelength of the incident wave in air

The frequency of the electromagnetic wave in air, f = 300 MHz = 3 * 10⁸ Hz

Speed of light in air, c = 3 * 10⁸ Hz

Wavelength of the incident wave in air:

$\lambda_{air} = \frac{c}{f} \\\lambda_{air} = \frac{3 * 10^{8} }{3 * 10^{8}} \\\lambda_{air} = 1 m$

Wavelength of the incident wave in medium 2

The refractive index of air in the lossless dielectric medium:

$n = \sqrt{\epsilon_{r} } \\n = \sqrt{9 }\\n =3$

$\lambda_{2} = \frac{c}{nf}\\\lambda_{2} = \frac{3 * 10^{6} }{3 * 3 * 10^{6}}\\\lambda_{2} = 1/3\\\lambda_{2} = 0.33 m$

b) Intrinsic impedances of media 1 and media 2

The intrinsic impedance of media 1 is given as:

$n_1 = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_{0} } }$

Permeability of free space, $\mu_{0} = 4 \pi * 10^{-7} H/m$

Permittivity for air, $\epsilon_{0} = 8.84 * 10^{-12} F/m$

$n_1 = \sqrt{\frac{4\pi * 10^{-7} }{8.84 * 10^{-12} } }$

$n_1 = 377 \Omega$

The intrinsic impedance of media 2 is given as:

$n_2 = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_r \mu_0}{\epsilon_r \epsilon_{0} } }$

Permeability of free space, $\mu_{0} = 4 \pi * 10^{-7} H/m$

Permittivity for air, $\epsilon_{0} = 8.84 * 10^{-12} F/m$

ϵr = 9

$n_2 = \sqrt{\frac{4\pi * 10^{-7} *1 }{8.84 * 10^{-12} *9 } }$

$n_2 = 125.68 \Omega$

c) The reflection coefficient,r and the transmission coefficient,t at the boundary.

Reflection coefficient, $r = \frac{n - n_{0} }{n + n_{0} }$

You didn't put the refractive index at the boundary in the question, you can substitute it into the formula above to find it.

$r = \frac{3 - n_{0} }{3 + n_{0} }$

Transmission coefficient at the boundary, t = r -1

d) The amplitude of the incident electric field is $E_{0} = 10 V/m$

Maximum amplitudes in the total field is given by:

$E = tE_{0}$ and $E = r E_{0}$

E = 10r, E = 10t

3 0

3 years ago

According to the law of mass, 8 grams of hydrogen and 32 grams of oxygen will combine to form how many grams of water?

seropon [69]

Answer:

36 grams of water

Explanation:

mass of H2O = 0.5 x 18 = 9g

7 0

2 years ago

PLS HELP I WILL MARK YOU AS A BRAINLEIST

frez [133]

Answer:

A Chemical Reaction towards Oxygen, Water, and the Chemical Color.

4 0

3 years ago

(Fiqure 1) shows the velocity-versus-time graphs for two objects A and B the motion of the ohiecds Zach savs The aranh could rep

olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

a.neither of them is correct

b. Zach's statement is not correct, since do not know where the objects started and can't be sure if they pass each other.

c. Victoria's statement is not correct as the objects have the opposite accelerations, however free-falling objects should have the same downward acceleration

Explanation:

Fiqure 1) shows the velocity-versus-time graphs for two objects A and B the motion of the ohiecds Zach savs The aranh could represent two cars Zach traveling in opposite directions that pass each other." Victoria says, "No, I think they could be R cally from a bridge, rock A is thrown upward Victoria downward

ans :neither of them is correct

Previous Answers Submit VCorrect Figure 1 of 1

Part B V,

Why is Zach's statement wrong? Check all that apply

. A Zach's statement is not correct, since the objects move in the same direction for some time interval.

Ans: Zach's statement is not correct, since do not know where the objects started and can't be sure if they pass each other.

Previous Answers Request Answer Submit x Incorrect;

Try Again

Part C

Why is Victoria's statement wrong? Check all that apply Victoria's statement is not correct as the objects both should have been thrown either upward or downward

Answer:. Victoria's statement is not correct as the objects have the opposite accelerations, however free-falling objects should have the same downward acceleration gGraph

My explanation further from the graph will be that there are opposite bodies, one is accelerating with time , why the other is decelerating with time.

6 0

4 years ago