Answer:
pros- It provides a clean, widely accepted ending to the election
-It keeps smaller states relevant in national politics.
cons-It can make people feel like their votes don’t matter.
- It gives too much power to swing states.
Explanation:
Answer: The correct answer is: Intergenerational mobility.
Explanation: Intergenerational mobility can be understood as the changes in social positions that may occur in a family from one generation to the next. These changes can take place for a great number of reasons, including education, lifestyle choices and economic context.
<u>In this particular case, Jess is experiencing Intergenerational mobility because she earned an advanced degree and secured a prestigious job, distacing herself from the social position that her parents had.</u>
Answer:
The answer is non-participant observation method.
Explanation:
In this method, the researcher is not part of the group being studied. The reseracher must decide beforehand if the study is realistic, ethical and relevant for the research. Among the many different ways to carry out this method, it is posible for the researcher to observe a group at different times and locations, for short periods.
It is also important for the researcher to record not only the behaviour observed, but also the type of behaviour that did NOT occur.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
According to the constitution of Nepal, the federal executive / council of minister are formed in following ways::
After the announcement of the final result of the election of the House Of Representatives, the president shall appoints the parliamentary party leader of the political party with the majority seat in the house of representatives as a prime minister and council of ministers is formed in his / her chairmanship.
IF no political party gets a clear majority in the election of House of representatives, president appoints the member of house of representatives as prime minister who can have the majority with the support of two or more political parties represented in the house of representatives.
Answer:
<h3>Yes, society as Kurt Vonnegut imagines in his "Harrison Bergeron" could be read as symbolic of realities in our society today.</h3>
Explanation:
Vonnegut's story presents a future where the U.S Constitution has created a complete uniform society where every citizen is treated equally in every aspects of life. However, to achieve this feat, the government has abolished the principles of individuality and personal liberty.The government subdues any form of individual talent or intellectual abilities.
Vonnegut does not seem to distinguish any particular government here, but we can relate a similar case given the time when he has written this story. The story was published in 1961 which was during the time of Cold War. Perhaps through this story, he wanted to criticize the socialist or Marxian form of government emphasized by USSR.
The story revolves a government that tries to subdue any form of individualistic ideas or innovations. It contrast the tenets of capitalism and democracy where individual freedom and talented intellectuals are oppressed by the government.
Similarly, the control of media and oppression of freedom of speech and expression by governments are some symbolic realities in our society today. This is because the government tries to suppress any form of dissent or criticism against them. Individuals who opposes the government are usually forced into silence by imprisonment and other forms of threats.
