The correct answer would be, Reformation.
Sometimes a contract does not accurately reflect the intentions of the parties because of some mechanical or clerical error in the document. When this happens, a legal action called a Reformation is necessary to correct the contract.
Explanation:
When two parties make a deal about anything, they write a contract which contains the clauses for that deal. But sometimes the contract does not accurately reflect the intentions of the parties, due to some mechanical or clerical error.
So when this happens, then the court orders the parties to rewrite the part of the contract which appears to be having wrong intentions. Actually, the court allows the parties to take some action and remove or correct the discrepancy.
This is called as Reformation.
Learn more about Reformation at:
brainly.com/question/14283313
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: Positive reinforcement
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement refers to the state of providing the subject with a reward or something whenever they tend to perform action required, so that they can associate this action with reward and therefore tend to do often. This reward is known as reinforcing stimulus. This type of consequence tend to works because in this case the brain frequently connects the desired action with the reward, and thus subject tends to repeat this desired action in order to get the reward in the future.
<span>Children's ideas about their intelligence, personality, abilities, gender, and ethnic background form their: self-concept
Self-concept come from personal ideas that constructed based on every thing around them, including family, social group, and experiences.
A child often will receive different point of view based on each interractions and will form a personal conclusion that led to the formation of their character and principle that transform them into adulthood</span>
Answer:
Pretext stop
Explanation:
In Whren v. United States (1996), the Supreme Court affirmed that officers could stop vehicles to allay any suspicions even though they have no evidence of criminal behavior. This type of stop is referred to as a pretext stop, a pretext stop involves a police officer stopping a driver for a traffic violation, minor or otherwise, to allow the officer to then investigate a separate and unrelated suspected criminal offense. According to Whren v. United States (1996), the Supreme Court affirmed that officers could stop vehicles to allay any suspicions even though they have no evidence of criminal behavior that is police officers can stop any vehicle to put at rest any suspicions even though the driver has not committed any crime.
It is the idea that God chose a king or queen to rule.
