1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
3 years ago
10

Why can’t America have a completely open border

History
1 answer:
saveliy_v [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

America cannot have a completely open border, for then there will be no "United States of America". A nation is defined by it's borders, and for it to be a sovereign nation, there must be a border, as well as guards to the border. In the case of opening the borders, you are essentially not only taking away the sovereignty of the nation, but also taking away from the very definition of a nation, "a large body of people united by common..., inhabiting a particular

land".  Without a border, without protection, without those who want to continue to help the US grow as a nation, America will not survive. In fact, no country will survive, as their benevolence will lead to structural & internal collapse.

~

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a main cause of the unemployment trend seen in the line graph
BigorU [14]

Answer:

B) Millions of Americans joined the U.S. military

Explanation:

One of the reasons why the unemployment rate dramatically decreased during these years was because millions of Americans joined the U.S. military. This is because during these years, World War II was taking place. Although the United States had remained neutral during the first few years of the war, it decided to get involved after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

4 0
3 years ago
Was advocating for socialism during the war equivalent to falsely shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre? explain.
Svetach [21]
<span>"Shouting fire in a crowded theater"</span><span> is a popular </span>metaphor<span> for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating unnecessary panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of </span>Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.<span>'s </span>opinion<span> in the </span>United States Supreme Court<span> case </span>Schenck v. United States<span> in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the </span>draft<span> during </span>World War I<span> was not protected </span>free speech<span> under the </span>First Amendment<span> of the </span>United States Constitution<span>.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Frances E. Willard and Carrie Nation primarily differed in
KengaRu [80]

The main difference between Frances Willard and Carrie Nation was<u> D. </u><u>ways </u><u>in which they </u><u>fought </u><u>for </u><u>temperance</u><u>.</u>

<h3>Frances Willard</h3>
  • Was a leader in the Women's suffrage movement and a supporter of the temperance movement.
  • Campaigned peacefully for people to practice temperance.

This was different to the methods of Carrie Nation who would attack and picket bars with her supporters.

In conclusion, option D is correct.

Find out more on the temperance movement at brainly.com/question/2724002.

8 0
2 years ago
Why did the Fugitive Slave Act anger Northerners? a) It contradicted the Missouri Compromise. b) It increased federal interventi
Papessa [141]

The answer is <u>b) It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states.</u>

By the time these federal Acts were enacted in the U.S., several Northern states had already abolished slavery but it was legal in the Southern states. The Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States, aiming to prevent that the Northern states would become safe havens for runaway slaves.

The last act was more rigid in their provision and stated more regulation, including the guarantee of harsher punishments for anyone interfering in runaways slave's capture, the right of slave owners and their “agents” to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states and compelled citizens to assist in their capture as well. It also denied slaves the right to a jury trial, among others.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 implied much government's intervention in the state's affairs, and this angered most northern states. They responded by intentionally neglecting the law or creating acts that nullified or that protected black people, the so-called "personal liberty laws", and by making great efforts to assist runaway slaves, among others.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the following selection from the section “Ignoring The Idea That All Men Were Created Equal."
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

compromise

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How much did the Korean War cost
    8·1 answer
  • Pigs and camels were first domesticated in the Middle East. These animals then spread to Africa and Asia due to a mass-migration
    12·1 answer
  • The power to enter into treaties with other countries and to make executive agreements with other heads of state is known as
    14·1 answer
  • The collapse of the Greek civilization during the Dark Ages increased which? poverty foreign trading income levels farming
    9·1 answer
  • What did citizen-soldiers who protected the city-states want?
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the role of NATO questioned during the 1990s? A. It seemed unecessary after the fall of the Soviet Union. B. NATO member
    5·1 answer
  • What was equianos purpose for writing this chapter of his narrative
    6·2 answers
  • The most dramatic change that has occurred in the realm of work since the information revolution has been
    13·1 answer
  • what impact could choosing one side over the other have on you? write a journal entry that makes predictions about what it might
    13·2 answers
  • Does your letter contain these elements? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!