So, the area of a parallelogram is the base times the height or

a being area
b being base
h being height
the height is 8 cm and the base is 15 cm
(remember: the heght should be perpendicular to the base)
so we plug in 8 for h and 15 for b to get

and 15 × 8 = (10 × 8) + (5 × 8) = 80 + 40 =120
So the answer is 120
Answer: 6928
----------------------------------------------------------
Explanation:
We have two areas we need to find: The area of the trapezoid and the area of the rectangle. Let's call these areas A1 and A2.
Area of Trapezoid = (height)*(base1+base2)/2
A1 = h*(b1+b2)/2
A1 = 80*(150+100)/2
A1 = 80*250/2
A1 = 20000
A1 = 10000
Area of Rectangle = (length)*(width)
A2 = L*W
A2 = 48*64
A2 = 3072
Subtract the two areas (A1-A2) to get the difference D
D = A1 - A2
D = 10000 - 3072
D = 6928
This difference D is exactly equal to the shaded area.
Answer:
Because the absolute value of the test statistic is <u>less than</u> the positive critical value, there <u>is not</u> enough evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of discarded paper and glass for a significance level of α = 0.05.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation matrix provided is:
Variables Paper Glass
Paper 1 0.1853
Glass 0.1853 1
Te hypothesis for the test is:
<em>H</em>₀: <em>ρ</em> = 0 vs. <em>H</em>₀: <em>ρ</em> ≠ 0
The test statistic is:
<em>r</em> = 0.1853 ≈ 0.185
As the alternate hypothesis does not specifies the direction of the test, the test is two tailed.
The critical value for the two-tailed test is:

The conclusion is:
Because the absolute value of the test statistic is <u>less than</u> the positive critical value, there <u>is not</u> enough evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of discarded paper and glass for a significance level of α = 0.05.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
3. x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's start with 1. we know that 2-x is the same as -2+x and since addition can be written as -2+x or x+(-2) and equal the same thing, we know that x-2 is the one that is not equivalent.