Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
First, let's work out the two triangles:
Area of triangle: bxh/2
2 x 8/2 = 8
Because there is two triangles multiply 8 by 2 = 16
To work out the area of the central rectangle:
Area of rectangle: l x w
3 x 8 = 24
Add 16+24 = 40 square feet
The answer is 4.5 miles. Hope it helps!
First we have the work out the area of 1 room. So that is 8ft * 12ft which is 96ft^2. And if there are 2 of these rooms, then we multiply this value by 2. Giving us a total area of 192ft^2.
0.04 is ten times more than 0.004
