Why is it sometimes difficult to make decisions involving economic development and the environment?

1 answer:

4 0

More often than not it is very hard to make decisions about economic development and the environment and manage to balance them so that both of them are in the desired position. The problem is that almost always the economic development depends on destroying parts of the environment, so often the choice is to either to stagnate on an economical basis and protect the environment, or push for economic development and destroy parts of the environment. This is very often a conflict situation, and in the last decades with the bigger awareness about the nature it is becoming even harder a decision to be made.

You might be interested in

What two factions exist in the Middle East? What does each stand for?

adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

Muslim and Islam

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Benjamin steals lunch from his coworkers and shouts and throws tantrums when confronted about this. In the context of workplace

nikdorinn [45]

There are some workplace deviances that we might face on everyday basis: always arriving late or leaving early, stealing office supplies, sexual harassment or disrupting productivity. In this case, Benjamin is showing a pattern of agressive behaviour or he might be a cleptomaniac. Usually, people that don't recognize that they have an attitude problem tend to respond in this way.

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Once a parent/guardian signs for a provisional license: A it cannot be taken away. B the license can be canceled by written requ

Margaret [11]

B is the correct answer

5 0

2 years ago

What emperor got rid of many harsh Qin policies

kiruha [24]

It was Liu bang from the han dynasty i believe

7 0

3 years ago

Which question is most relevant to a court when determining whether a particular type of speech can be limited?

Deffense [45]

I believe the answer is: Does the speech pose a threat to the public <span>interest?

One example of such speech would be a speech that call for a destruction of other people's house. This type of speech could either make the target of speech feel unsafe/distress, or make other people actually persuaded to destroy the house. Since both of them are breaking the law, such speech is not protected under free speech.
</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers