It really depends on which president.
The president in a Marxist or communist society is indeed could be considered of having too much power since the government basically controlled 100% of the socio and economic policies.
The president in a democratic country actually does not have as much power as the civilians who elected him.
The answer is argument. :)
Answer:
Poverty and wealth are often found side by side. They are two dimensions in our world that are interrelated because they affect each other and influence both the willingness and capacity of states to ensure a stable global system. Traditional approaches to IR are premised on the notion of state sovereignty. But, sovereignty as an absolute concept that reinforces separation between states has been tempered through the many processes of globalisation, including economic agreements and the establishment of international organisations, as well as with the emergence of human rights thinking as captured through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With respect to the emergence of human rights thinking, the premise goes that in the context of a common set of universal rights based on the individual, the sovereignty of the state can be challenged if a government does not respect or maintain these rights. Here, sovereignty means that a state does not only maintain rights, it also meets its responsibilities. Poor people are cheated out of their savings and the rich flaunt their money like it's honest and hard worked generated money.
Answer:
In simple words, The term "War on Terror" was used to relate directly to the current military effort undertaken by the United States, U.K. And their alliances against groups and governments they classify as terrorists, which generally ignore other specific anti - terrorist activities and efforts including those carried out by Russia and India.
