Answer:
$355 unfavorable
Explanation:
Budgeted supplies cost was [$1,860 + (635 frames x $ 11)] = ($1,860 + $6,985) = $8,845
Actual supplies cost was $9,200, so the variance was = budgeted cost - actual cost = $8,845 - $9,200 = $355 unfavorable
Since the actual supplies cost was higher than the budgeted supplies cost, then the variance must be unfavorable (because more money was spent than expected).
Answer:
We have to discount these payments to find the present value
500,000
500,000/1.1
500,000/1.1^2
500,000/1.1^3
We keep on doing this until we reach 500,000/1.1^19
After that we add all the payments and get the value. A less time consuming way of doing it is using a financial calculator
Pv=?
N=19
FV=0
PMT=500,000
=4,182,460.05 we add 500,000 to this because the first payment was not discounted=4,682,460.05= Present Value.
Explanation:
I guess the correct answer is microeconomic analysis.
GeeGee’s is a community-based bakery known for its scrumptious tea cakes. The recipe calls for expensive spices imported from Asia. Recently the cost of these spices has risen dramatically, leading GeeGee’s to consider increasing its prices. In order to analyze how this change would affect consumer choices, GG’s management could perform a microeconomic analysis.
Answer:
Causal ambiguity
Explanation:
Causal Ambiguity is a situation is which it is impossible to replicate the consequences or effects of an event or thing or phenomena.
This is mostly used in the development of share prices among other things.
In the case of the question, the inability to relate the relationship between culpability and the firm's competitve advantage is why its ideas can not be imitated by any other firm.
Cheers.
