1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksklad [387]
3 years ago
8

Why were so few violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act brought to court?

History
1 answer:
LenKa [72]3 years ago
6 0
There are several reasons why so few violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act were brought to court, but a major reason was that ironically the courts were often corrupted, making it impossible to for them to want to hear about a corruption case. 
You might be interested in
Which statement best describes the relative location of West Africa edgenudity sorry i dont have alot of points
Helen [10]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
in the 1850s why did harriet feel compelled to escort her escaped slaves all the way to st. catherine’s
mina [271]
One reason was that the Fugitive Slave Law that was part of the compromise of 1850 changed everything.
6 0
3 years ago
Describe at least four conditions of slaves on the ship during the middle passage
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

Slaves below the decks lived for months in conditions of squalor and indescribable horror

Disease spread and ill health was one of the biggest killers

Mortality rates were high

death made these conditions below the decks even worse

The slaves who had already been ill ridden were not always found immediately

Many of the living slaves could have been shackled to someone that was dead for hours and sometimes days

Explanation:

They were also beaten at most times

starved

and just mis treated in general

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which way was the presidential election of 2008 unique in American history?
Alecsey [184]
The first black president was elected and this was the way in which the presidential election of 2008 was unique in American history. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope the answer comes to your help.
4 0
2 years ago
Gender Roles in the Renaissance
grigory [225]
Women's lives did not improve at all if anything they were worsened. Rich woman during the renaissance had very little say in anything and was taught to help their husband run a business and take care of him and the house. The poor woman had no say in anything they only had to choices at life, they could either be a housewife and take care of the kids and the house ore they had to become a nun. The poor woman could not be single or have any rights.


The role of women was very scarce. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance, women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'

Though women were inferior to men, women in different classes had different roles. Low-class women were expected to be housewives and take care of everything to do with the house. The expectation of working-class women was a little bit different. These women were expected to work for their husbands and help them run their business. They would work alongside their husbands and then go home and take care of the household. Upper-class women may have had servants and workers working for them but the women were still expected to take care of the household.


Women could not work by themselves. Neither could they live alone if they were not married. If a woman was single, she was made to move in with one of her male relatives or join a convent and become a nun. There was no other option at this time for women.


In conclusion in different classes of women, the only women that were allowed to express themselves were upper-class women, but not sufficiently. The existence of women was there but it was a marginal existence. Very rarely would a woman of less than upper class be seen or heard expressing herself. It was unheard of. When women did express themselves, what they would express was tainted by male influence.

this is the citation I already put it through citation machine Gender Roles of Women in the Renaissance, www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/eng/lfletcher/shrew/acloud.htm#:~:text=Mostly%20everything%20women%20did%20had,legally%20belong%20to%20their%20husbands.


Explanation:
please make mine the brainleist answer so i can get 19 more points. thank you
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did World War II contribute to the outbreak of the Korean War?
    15·1 answer
  • The way of life where a person withdraws
    14·1 answer
  • Match the words with the definitions.
    5·2 answers
  • Which state elected Hiram Rhodes Revels to the U.S. Senate
    11·1 answer
  • Which phrase best describes the structure of the executive branch?
    13·1 answer
  • Isang prosesokung saan malinaw na nakikilala o nakikita ng isang tao ang pagkakaiba iba ng mga bagay
    11·1 answer
  • The explorer Vasco was finally able
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Homestead Strike is correct?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe 2 key features of the catholic beliefs about the organisation of the church
    8·1 answer
  • Endless fun and y’all will be okay with ya ya know ya ya?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!