Answer:
Great centers of religious learning were also centers of knowledge and scientific development.
from the second half of the eighth century to the end of the eleventh century, Islamic scientific developments were the basis of knowledge in the world. At a period of history when the scientific and philosophical heritage of the ancient world was about to be lost, Islamic scholars stepped in to preserve that heritage from destruction. Indeed, without the cultivation of science in these early centuries by Islamic scholars, it is probable that texts which later exercised a formative influence over Western culture would never have survived intact. It is certain, moreover, that the modern world would look much different than it does today.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Columbia River Basin
Explanation:
The Columbia River Basin provides more than 40% of total U.S. hydroelectric generation. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, from Bonneville Power Administration
<3 Enjoy,
Dea
Because <span>its a system of </span>democratic governance<span> of a </span>state<span> where the </span>executive branch<span> derives its democratic legitimacy from the </span>legislature<span> (</span>parliament<span>) and is also held accountable to that legislature. In a parliamentary system, the </span>head of state<span> is normally a different person from the </span>head of government<span>. This is in contrast to a </span>presidential system<span> in a democracy, where the head of state often is also the head of government, and most importantly, the executive branch does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.
</span>
The type of channel that speaker one and speaker two use in their communication would be auditory - b.
The fact that we're talking about "speaker" 1 and "speaker" 2 implies already the fact that both of them are talking and this then implies that they are using the auditory channel of communication.
The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.
- Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.
- Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.
You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
<em>The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.</em>
Learn more about what inflation is:
brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
