Answer:
1. False
2. Shortage; Larger
Explanation:
1. A binding price ceiling is one that prevents the market from reaching its equilibrium. In this market, the equilibrium price is $25 therefore anything below $25 will be binding. A price ceiling below $25 per box is a binding ceiling.
2<em>. Assuming that the long-run demand for oranges is the same as the short-run demand, you would expect a binding price ceiling to result in a </em><em><u>shortage</u></em><em> that is </em><em><u>larger</u></em><em> in the long run than in the short run.</em>
In the long run, supply is more sensitive because farmers can decide to plant oranges on their land, to plant something else, or to sell their land altogether.
This means that a price ceiling in the long run will be less attractive to farmers so they might leave the market. If they do this then the shortage will be more as there are now less supplies in the market.
Answer:
The goodwill is $1.1 million
Explanation:
In this question, first we have to compute the net asset which is shown below:
Net asset = Total asset - total liabilities
where,
Total asset = Land + building + inventory
= $1.7 million + $3.4 million + $2.2 million
= $7.3 million
And, the total liabilities = long term note payable = $1.5 million
So, the net asset would equal to
= $7.3 million - $1.5 million
= $5.8 million
Now the goodwill equal to
= Cash purchase price - net asset
= $6.8 million - $5.8 million
= $1.0 million
Answer:
marketing team and review resources
Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, it states that there is a positive relationship between the price of a commodity and the quantity supplied of a commodity. This means that as the price of a commodity increases, as a result the quantity supplied of that commodity increases.
Therefore, any change occur in the prices of a commodity will affect the quantity supplied of a commodity not supply of a commodity.
Answer:
d. Choose Option B because it has a higher NPV
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For Option A:
Investment = $10 million
Present Value of cash flows = Cash flow ÷ Discounting rate
= $2 ÷ 10%
= $20 million
Now
NPV = $20 - $10
= $10 million
We know that
IRR is the rate at which the NPV will be zero
So, 2 ÷ r - 10 = 0
r = 20%
For Option B:
Investment = $50 million
Present Value of cash flows = $6.5 ÷ 10% = $65 million
NPV = $65 - $50 = $15 million
we know that
IRR is the rate at which the NPV will be zero
So, 6.5÷ r -50 = 0
r = 13%
Based on NPV, Option B should be selected as it contains higher NPV as compared to option A.
However, Based on IRR, Option A should be chosen as it contains higher IRR and a higher IRR represent a higher profit percentage
