Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
pop 1 n₁ = 260, p₁ = 58% = 0.58
pop 2 n₂ = 260, p₂ = 8% = 0.08
Null hypothesis: p₁ ≤ p₂
Alternative hypothesis: p₁ > p₂
The test statistic : p₁-p₂ / √{p-sample (1 - p-sample) (1/n₁ + 1/n₂)}
where p-sample is sample proportion = p₁n₁ +p₂n₂ / n₁+n₂
Thus, p-sample = 0.58x260 +0.08x260 / 260+260 =150.8+20.8 / 520 = 171.6 / 520 = 0.33.
Thus, the test statistic is (0.58 - 0.08) / √[0.33 (1-0.33) (0.0038+0.0038)
= 0.5 / √[0.33(0.67) (0.0076)
= 0.5 / √0.00168036
= 0.5 / 0.04099
= 12.20
P = P(Z>12.20) = 1-P(Z≤12.20) at a significance level of 0.1= the p-value is less than the hypothesized thus, we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and concluding that vinyl gloves have a greater virus leak than latex gloves.
Start with 180.
<span>Is 180 divisible by 2? Yes, so write "2" as one of the prime factors, and then work with the quotient, 90. </span>
<span>Is 90 divisible by 2? Yes, so write "2" (again) as another prime factor, then work with the quotient, 45. </span>
<span>Is 45 divisible by 2? No, so try a bigger divisor. </span>
<span>Is 45 divisible by 3? Yes, so write "3" as a prime factor, then work with the quotient, 15 </span>
<span>Is 15 divisible by 3? [Note: no need to revert to "2", because we've already divided out all the 2's] Yes, so write "3" (again) as a prime factor, then work with the quotient, 5. </span>
<span>Is 5 divisible by 3? No, so try a bigger divisor. </span>
Is 5 divisible by 4? No, so try a bigger divisor (actually, we know it can't be divisible by 4 becase it's not divisible by 2)
<span>Is 5 divisible by 5? Yes, so write "5" as a prime factor, then work with the quotient, 1 </span>
<span>Once you end up with a quotient of "1" you're done. </span>
<span>In this case, you should have written down, "2 * 2 * 3 * 3 * 5"</span>
Ur answer is 2% because u minus it and u find the percentage
Answer:
pit it on -4 because your reflecting it on x
