Answer:
False.
The advantages from 1 vendor to 1 business relationship is that the trust implicit in the contract is stronger as both parties need each other to gain. Logistically there are obvious advantages to the only use of 1 vendor, but the disadvantage is the power that is gained by the vendor in front of the business.
This means that if a company only uses one vendor, but this vendor provides to several companies. Then, if the vendor decides to charge a higher price for the goods or services the company will have to accept as it does not have another vendor to get the goods or services from.
<span>This is affirmative action. This concept allows for group members from classically-discriminated against groups to have the ability to gain a foothold in companies and groups. This allows the discriminated-against group to have the ability to advance in their careers, where they would not have been able to in the past due to cultural admonitions against having minorities as part of a business.</span>
Here is the correct answer of the given question above. The early efforts that were made to control the new corporate industrial giants, and how effective these efforts were is the Anti-Trust Sherman Act. This kept big businesses from grouping together and acquiring a monopoly in whatever they are doing. Hope this answer helps.
Answer:
13.05%
Explanation:
Using CAPM Equation, Ke = Rf+Beta*(Rm-Rf)
= 0.045+1.3*(0.07)
= 0.136
= 13.60%
Using Dividend growth model, Ke = (D1/P0) + g
= (D0*(1+g)/P0) = g
= (1.50*(1+0.08)/36) + 0.08
= 0.125
= 12.50
The cost of equity (Ke) = 0.136 + 0.125 / 2
The cost of equity (Ke) = 0.261/2
The cost of equity (Ke) = 0.1305
The cost of equity (Ke) = 13.05%
The least likely to receive tax dollars is Liberty Baptist University because of its religious beliefs.
