Answer:
Mark should include in the letter to avoid litigation charges:
Specific facts about the consultant that can be verified.
Explanation:
False information, sentiment-hurting statements, or personal opinions about the consultant's character should never be found in formal letters that are meant to offer constructive criticisms. This means that only specific facts that are verifiable should be included. Formal letters are not avenues for character defamation. They are called "formal" because they must stick to specific and relevant official purposes.
This is called private branding (or private labeling)
For better understanding, we have to understand what the term private branding (or private labeling) means
- Private branding (or private labeling) is simply known as when a company produces a particular product and thereafter sells the product to a retailer who later on resells it after registering or branding it under its own name.
- An example is when Povlix watch maker make watches for Pinnacle to sell as its Nacles watch.
- A brand is often regarded as the name,design etc that set apart an organization or product from other companies (mostly its rivals) in the eyes of the customer.
From the above, we can therefore say that the answer that this is called private branding (or private labeling) is correct
Learn more about private branding (or private labeling) from:
brainly.com/question/17372249
Answer:
a. product platform
Explanation:
Product platform -
It refers the process of designing , where all the parts of the goods or services have some common element in common , is referred to as product platform .
The method is used to -
- increases the process of developing new products ,
- reduce the cost of development ,
- a single element acts as a identification for the product .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct option is a. product platform .