1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetlanka [38]
3 years ago
11

You extend an impromptu invitation to a friend for dinner. The only food you have is a couple of frozen steaks. You wish to defr

ost the steaks before grilling them. You defrost one by using your microwave oven, and you defrost the other by placing it in a bowl of very warm water. In each case, decide whether heat is transferred by conduction, convection, radiation, or some combination of these mechanisms. (Select all that apply.)
Microwave:

a. conduction.
b. convection.
c. radiation

Water:

a. conduction.
b. convection.
c. radiation
Physics
1 answer:
kakasveta [241]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Microwave: Radiation

Water: Conduction, convection & radiation.

Explanation:

  • When we heat a food using microwave then the water content of the food is only heated by the microwave.
  • Microwaves make the molecules of water vibrate frequently with a frequency closer to the frequency of microwaves and this increases the kinetic energy of the molecules which produces heat in the water molecules this heat then propagates to the whole food by conduction and convection, but the heat enters the food only via radiation.

Now when the food item is kept into warm water then the molecules closer to the food heat the food by conduction through direct energy transfer by lattice vibrations and when they become cooler than the mass of water all around then due to density difference they settle down and their place is occupied by warmer molecules around in the fluid leading to convection.

Radiation of energy from a mass occurs continuously irrespective of the medium present there. So the heat of water also enters the food by radiation of energy from the water molecules.

You might be interested in
An explosion occurs 34 km away. the time it takes for its sound to reach your ears, traveling at 340 m/s, is
Murrr4er [49]
Let's convert the distance in meters first:
d=34 km=34000 m=3.4 \cdot 10^4 m
The sound wave travels at speed 
v=340 m/s
So we can use the basic relationship between space, time and velocity to calculate the time it takes for the sound to reach our ears:
t= \frac{S}{v}= \frac{3.4 \cdot 10^4 m}{340 m/s}=100 s
3 0
3 years ago
________ cable is NOT subject to electromagnetic interference or radio frequency interference. Polycarbonate Twisted-pair Coaxia
malfutka [58]

Answer:

The correct option is: d. Fiber-optic

Explanation:

A fiber-optic cables or an optical-fiber cable is a cable that is composed of a bundle of optical fibers. These cables are used for transmitting information or digital signals over long distances.

Each optical fiber in an optical-fiber cable is individually coated with a protective plastic cover and contained in a protective tube. Therefore, an optical-fiber cable is not affected by any electromagnetic interference or radio frequency interference.

5 0
3 years ago
If mr galans paces is equal to 1.8 m,how many paces would it take to get to the moon
Anettt [7]

Answer:

The number of paces it would take to get to the Moon is 213,555,556 paces

Explanation:

The given length of Mr Galan's paces = 1.8 m/pace

The distance from the Earth to the Moon is, 384,400 km = 384,400,000 m

Therefore, the number of paces, "n", it would take to get to the Moon from the Earth is given as follows;

n = (The distance from the Earth to the Moon)/(The length of each Mr Galan's paces)

∴ n = 384,400,000 m/(1.8 m/pace) = 213,555,556 paces

The number of paces it would take to get to the Moon = n = 213,555,556 paces

5 0
3 years ago
If an objects speed is constant and the direction is in a straight line what type of velocity does the object have
storchak [24]
That's unaccelerated motion, and constant velocity.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Could a vector ever be shorter than one of its components? Equal in length to one of its components? Explain.
yaroslaw [1]
It can never be shorter than a component - magnitude of a vector is the square root of the sum of the components squared, and a square function never produces a negative number. However, it can be the same size as it's component, if that component is the only one.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A 0.350 kg block at -27.5°C is added to 0.217 kg of water at 25.0°C. They come to equilibrium at 16.4°C. What is the specific he
    6·1 answer
  • La biomasa es una fuente de energía es limpia o contaminante
    14·1 answer
  • What is the pitch of a sound wave?
    12·1 answer
  • Two small plastic spheres each have a mass of 1.1 g and a charge of -50.0 nC . They are placed 2.1 cm apart (center to center).
    11·1 answer
  • A resistor rated at 690 kΩ is connected across two D cell batteries (each 1.50 V) in series, with a total voltage of 3.00 V. The
    11·1 answer
  • SCIENCE HELP MEEEE PLEASE
    14·1 answer
  • A radio transfers 270 j of energy electrically, 94.5 j is transferred by sound. Work out the efficiency of this radio. Give your
    7·1 answer
  • newton's 3rd law is known as the law of______? is it different objects or the same objects or objects in motion?
    15·1 answer
  • I really need Brainliest i am desprate
    12·1 answer
  • A circuit consists of a resistance R, and an inductance L in parallel connected, which is in series with a second resistance R2.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!