Answer:
C) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
Explanation:
The following multiple choice responses are provided to complete the question:
A) The Pearson correlation results should be reported because it shows a stronger correlation with a smaller p-value (more significant).
B) The Pearson correlation results should be reported because the two variables are normally distributed.
C) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
D) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because the p-value is closer to 0.0556.
Further Explanation:
A count variable is discrete because it consists of non-negative integers. The number of polyps variable is therefore a count variable and will most likely not be normally distributed. Normality of variables is one of the assumptions required to use Pearson correlation, however, Spearman's correlation does not rest upon an assumption of normality. Therefore, the Spearman correlation would be more appropriate to report because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
A. (-20)4
Hope this helped! With love, Eilyssa! :)
.21 as a percentage is 21%
You can divide 7.98 by 21 then multiply by 100 which gives you an answer of 38.
Hope this helps :)
<span>The term that you want is 5C2*p^2*q^3
representing 2 successes and 3 failures. This term's value is</span>
<span>(5C2)(0.5^5)
= 10*0.03125 = 0.3125 = P(2 successes in 5 trials) =31.3% </span>
If you mean how far did you go you went 80 km
