Answer:
d. act as a control that would ensure that the results obtained are due to a difference in only one variable.
Explanation:
The primary reason for including a comparison population within the design of this experiment in which there was a need to also examine a comparison population of humans in which births took place every month would be to act as a control that would ensure that the results obtained are due to a difference in only one variable. This would ensure more accuracy of the experiment in relation to the factor considered.
Cohen's Shatterbelt Theory predicted that armed conflict would most likely occur in which of the following countries is e. South Africa
The main feature of a Shatterbelt, as described by way of Cohen, is that it presents the same gambling area to 2 or more competing global powers, operating from unique geostrategic realms. The Shabberbelts of the Nineteen Seventies – sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, are not Shatterbelts, however, the center East remains one.
The shatter belt idea can be defined as:
- The international locations like Ukraine, Turkey, Syria, Korea, and the center East belong to the shelterbelt regions.
- these components are characterized by the cultural-political conflicts and involvement of the defense force.
- The Sub-Saharan and South African regions are taken into consideration as the shelterbelt vicinity.
The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.
Cohen's Shatterbelt Theory predicted that armed conflict would MOST likely occur in which of the following countries?
a.france
b. Hungary
c. Norway
d. Spain
e. South Africa
Learn more about Cohen's Shatterbelt Theory here brainly.com/question/3665882
#SPJ4
The fallacies of misdirected and emotional appeals bad arguments becausemisdirected appeals are arguments that “appeals to a questionable authority”. Fallacies of misdirected appeals are bad arguments because the statement is misdirecting the reader by the use of a questionable person of authority in a different subject matter that is not in their field of expertise, thus providing non-supporting evidence for the conclusion
.An emotional appeal is an “argument that appeals to fear”. Fallacies of emotional appeals are bad arguments because they are based on emotions rather than on valid or supporting evidence.
Emotional appeals are used to create a sense of fear into the audience, thus the reactions of the audience are based on their emotions and uncertainties rather than supporting evidence to formulate an educated and unbiased opinion or conclusion
Learn more about argument here:brainly.com/question/3775579
#SPJ4
Answer:
El pensamiento sociológico se centra en la estructura y organización de la sociedad y cómo esto se relaciona con los problemas sociales y las vidas individuales. ... Otros han argumentado que la pobreza puede entenderse mejor como resultado de las formas en que los recursos y las oportunidades se distribuyen de manera desigual en la sociedad.
Explanation:
