<span>The president of the United States has just the right amount of power. He is able to enact and remove executive orders, but for any long-term change he needs the support of congress. The three branches of government provide substantial checks and balances to limit absolute power.</span>
<u>Indeed, President Wilson was unsatisfied with settlement from the Central Powers and the signature of the Treaty of Versailles, beyond most of his fourteen points were accepted and included in the final document. He had territorial, economic and military reasons for that:</u>
<u>1. Territorial reasons:</u> he disagreed with Great Britain and France imperialist intentions and he was angry at the fact that some Germany's and Ottoman Empire's colonies passed to Great Britain and France (Alsace-Lorraine, Germany’s overseas colonies, Iraq, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon), as territories in mandates.
<u>2. Economical reasons</u>: Wilson also wanted economic reparations to be given to France as France owed important money to the United States at that time.
<u>3. Military reasons:</u> According to the Treaty, the German army was to be reduced to 100,000 soldiers, armaments sufficient for such army and, to prevent the reserves reconstruction, officers were to serve for twenty-five years and men for twelve. However, President Wilson's concern was that only Germany was forced to disarmament and other countries were not treated the same way.
Richard Cordray is the director of the consumer financial protection bureau.
Explanation:
He says that the American households lack checking or savings account which will make them rely on costly financial services will just add burden to their savings. He also addresses that as the people become old, they need their money to be protected and easily accessible.
He says that family households must turn their focus towards banking as it creates a connect to the future. He also adds that by understanding this problem from the young age, people would start feeling the significance of managing the financial systems.
<span>As indicated
by the article, Coca-Cola did not react quickly enough to alleviate and pacify
its purchasers that its Coke items are harmless and lawful. As indicated by
Coke's </span>social
responsibility commitments, the assertions of legislators spread quickly through India.
Nonetheless, the organization neglected to acknowledge how quick news went to.
Rather than looking to recover the trust and support from its clients, Coke
concentrated excessively on different workarounds. Coca-Cola shaped advisory groups
in India and the US. The advisory groups invested energy to run the tests, besides;
Coke was quiet to its shoppers. As specified by Mr. Seth, Coke's Indian
advertising expert, in the Indian culture, "Here individuals translate silence
as crime". Buyers needed to hear the official clarification from Coca-Cola
instantly and they would not like to hold up later. At long last, Coca-Cola
safeguarded their organization by claiming that different organizations have
comparative issues like Coke.
