Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

John must have at least 289 test points to pass his math class. He already has test scores of 72, 78, and 70. Which inequality w

ill tell him at least how many more points he needs to pass the class?

1 answer:

postnew [5]3 years ago

4 0

72 + 78 + 70 + x > = 289 (thats greater then or equal)

or
220 + x > = 289

You might be interested in

Among the four northwestern states, Washington has 51% of the total population, Oregon has 30%, Idaho has 11%, and Montana has 8

morpeh [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

H₀ : The distribution of the sample agrees with the population distribution.

H₁ : the distribution of the does not agree with the population distribution.

Using the Chi-square test statistics

we will compute the expected frequencies

Now expected frequency for Washington will be

Fe = Npi = 1000×51% = 5100

expected frequency for Oregon

Fe = Npi = 1000×30% = 300

expected frequency for Idaho

Fe = Npi = 1000×11% = 110

expected frequency for Montana

Fe = Npi = 1000×8% = 80

The Chi=square test statistics is;

x² = ∑ [ (Fo - Fe)² / Fe )

now we substitute

Given our Fo ( 450 in Washington, 340 in Oregon, 150 in Idaho, and 60 in Montana) from the question

x² = (450-510)²/510 + (340-300)²/300 + (150-110)²/110 + (60-80)²/80

x²= 31.9376

so the chi-square test statistics is 31.9376

Now the chi-square critical value

first we compute for degree of freedom

d.f = k -1 = 4 - 1 = 3

So from the critical value table, degree of freedom 3 and significance level 0.05,

the chi-square critical value is 7.8147

Therefore chi-square test statistics 31.9376 is greater than the chi-square critical value 7.8147, so NULL HYPOTHESIS IS REJECTED at 5% significance.

There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the distribution of the sample agrees with the distribution of the state populations.

3 0

3 years ago

Ginny is studying a population of frogs. She determines that the population is decreasing at an average rate of 3% per year. Whe

Rama09 [41]

You can see how this works by thinking through what's going on.

In the first year the population declines by 3%. So the population at the end of the first year is the starting population (1200) minus the decline: 1200 minus 3% of 1200. 3% of 1200 is the same as .03 * 1200. So the population at the end of the first year is 1200 - .03 * 1200. That can be written as 1200 * (1 - .03), or 1200 * 0.97

What about the second year? The population starts at 1200 * 0.97. It declines by 3% again. But 3% of what??? The decline is based on the population at the beginning of the year, NOT based no the original population. So the decline in the second year is 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97). And just as in the first year, the population at the end of the second year is the population at the beginning of the second year minus the decline in the second year. So that's 1200 * 0.97 - 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97), which is equal to 1200 * 0.97 (1 - 0.03) = 1200 * 0.97 * 0.97 = 1200 * 0.972.

So there's a pattern. If you worked out the third year, you'd see that the population ends up as 1200 * 0.973, and it would keep going like that.

So the population after x years is 1200 * 0.97x

5 0

3 years ago

Arthur wants to buy an item that costs p dollars before tax. Using the Florida tax rate of 6%, write two different expressions t

REY [17]

The different expressions that represent the price of the item after tax will be p + 6/100p and p + 0.06p.

<h3>How to illustrate the expression?</h3>

The first expression will be:

= p + (6/100 × p)

= p + 6/100p

The second expression will be:

= p + (6% × p)

= p + 0.06p

It should be noted that both expressions are equal.

Learn more about tax on:

brainly.com/question/25783927

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

Find the producy of 36 and 62

Serhud [2]

***product

36 x 62 = 2232

7 0

3 years ago

You know whats weird lol?

irga5000 [103]

Answer:

wow

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers