This would be a customer profile.
Hope this helps.
<span>The main assumption that has to be true for Adam Smith's theories to be valid is that everyone is acting in a way that most benefits them and nobody else. Since resources are seen as limited, people are thought to act in ways that most benefit them and nobody else. These assumptions might be valid in many cases, but the concept of charity shows that they are not always the case, and the invisible hand might be guiding people at times, but not always.</span>
Answer:
may be liable for both the negligent and intentional acts.
Explanation:
In the case when an agent is within the scope of agent relationship that committed both type of acts i.e. negligent and intentional that results the injury to the third party so here the principal may be liable for both the act i.e. negligent and intentional as it is followed by the doctrine of respodeat superior
Therefore the second option is correct