Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The standard form of a linear equation is
, where
,
, and
are constants in the equation.
Based on the equation you have provided, the standard form would be
, where
.
To find the y-intercept, set
.

Therefore, the y-intercept is
.
Do the same thing for the x-intercept, but this time with
.

Therefore, the x-intercept is
.
<em>Hi!</em>
<em></em>
<em>These can be set up as systems of equations.</em>
<em> </em>
<em>Let b = the number of birds, and let d = the number of dogs.</em>
<em> </em>
<em>b + d = 21</em>
<em> </em>
<em>2b + 4d = 76 (this is because birds have 2 legs and dogs have 4 legs.)</em>
<em> </em>
<em>You can solve this using either elimination or substitution.</em>
<em></em>
<em>Consider marking brainliest.</em>
We must follow order of operations rules (PEMDAS) here: exponentiation first, followed by multiplication and division, followed by addition and subtraction.
Thus, -2^2-3(-2)+1 becomes:
-[4] + 6 + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3 (answer)
A statement which best describes the strength of the correlation, and the causation between the variables is that: D. it is a strong positive correlation, and it is likely causal.
<h3>What is a positive correlation?</h3>
A positive correlation can be defined as a terminology that is used to described a scenario (situation) in which two variables move in the same direction and are in tandem.
This ultimately implies that, a positive correlation exist when two variables have a linear relationship or are in direct proportion. Hence, when one variable increases, the other increases as well, and vice-versa.
By critically observing the scatter plot (see attachment) which models the data in the given table, we can infer and logically deduce that the value on the y-axis (circumference) increases as the value on the x-axis (radius) increases, so this is a strong positive correlation.
Also, we know that there exist a direct relationship between the circumference of a circle and its radius, so this relationship is most likely causal.
In conclusion, a statement which best describes the strength of the correlation, and the causation between the variables is that it's a strong positive correlation, and it is likely causal.
Read more on positive correlation here: brainly.com/question/10644261
#SPJ1
Answer:
measure the distance between two points on the ground and then measure angles between the top