Machiavelli believes that <span>the princes can use and should use violence in order to survive or to achieve their aims as rulers, especially when there is a problem in the country ot connected with the country. In such situations the princes should keep the people in fear, so no one would want to attack them or take their power. Otherwise, by providing housing and women, he should keep the peace in the country, In this sense is contradictory how he advises the princes to be more liberal. </span>
Kshatriya were 2nd class, who ruled the Empires whereas Brahmin were 1st class, who could get their education & can become priests, only lower casts like shudra & dalit can't get along with other higher classes but they both could
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Question 3 is the first option
Answer:
Number 1?
Explanation:
if your looking for a fine cut answer then I would go with Number 1 but in reality none of these answers are correct southerners did not welcome the abolishment of slavery in anyway. While legally slavery was no more it was replaced with other systems like share cropping that continued to oppress minorities, as well as segregated bathrooms, schools and water fountains many minorities found it near imposable to find stable job from discriminative white business owners.
Answer,
Economic stability
Explanation
Economic stability refers to abscence of excessive flactuationsin the macroeconomy.
planting of crops led to food security without food human life cannot be sustained hence other products cannot be produced.surplus production of crpos led to development of civilization which led to a stable economy because farmers could earn income from their products A stable economy later leads to political stabilty .
