1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alla [95]
3 years ago
9

kate is making a recipe that calls for 1 2/3 cups of sugar. she wants to cut the recipe in half. how much sugar should kate use

Mathematics
1 answer:
denis-greek [22]3 years ago
8 0

she should use 5 thirds of a cup

You might be interested in
What is 6/2(1+2)? Correct answers only please!!
kherson [118]

Answer:

your answer is 9

hope this helps xx

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

6 0
3 years ago
What can you say about flat bicycle tire
Elis [28]
The bicycle tire is flat
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement explains why the perimeter of the rectangle can be found using l + w + l + w or 2l + 2w?
mrs_skeptik [129]
BOTH    they both are correct bc they both state the same thing     perimeter is both length+ both width's so l+l+w+w=2l+2w

3 0
4 years ago
I need help please!!
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

hyperbola

pleasemark as brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The container that holds the water for the football team is 1/6 full. After pouring in 14 gallons of water, it is 3/4 full. How
    6·1 answer
  • If a number is divisible by 10, then its ones digit is 0 <br> TRUE OR FALSE
    12·2 answers
  • the flagpole cast an 8 foot shadow, as shown in the table.At the same time the oak tree cast a 12 foot shadow.How tall is the oa
    8·1 answer
  • Hey can you please help me posted picture of question
    9·1 answer
  • Squareroot(y-1) + 3 = y
    14·1 answer
  • Im drowning. pls help. ​
    14·1 answer
  • 10.) Write -1/6 , 5/3 , -5/6 in order from least to greatest
    12·1 answer
  • PQRS is a parallelogram <br> Explain why Use CER to assist in your argument
    14·1 answer
  • The sum of two integers is -360. One of them is 60, then the other integer is
    10·1 answer
  • If the addition costs $45,000, will the business have enough money to pay for it? Say yes or no:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!