Answer:
Step-by-step B. is your answer
explanation:
(C) "having a deep fondness for border collies and therefore overestimating them"
While acknowledging that "dogs may be noble, charming, loyal, and dependable," the author of Passage 1 speculates that they might not have "earned those extra intellect points." In contrast, the author's admiration for dogs may lead one to believe that the depiction of "pure intelligence shining in the face of a border collie" in lines 63–67 is exaggerated.
The answer is not (A). Passage 1's author would probably assume that Passage 2's author has a strong emotional bond with dogs. (B) is the wrong answer. The subjective assessment of canine intellect is shown in lines 63–67. They don't imply that the author of Passage 2 has in-depth understanding of the relevant studies.
The answer is not (D). Despite the fact that the author of Passage 2 appears to prefer personal experience over the findings of scientific investigations, lines 63–67 do not demonstrate any scorn for "traditional" research. The answer is not (E).
It would be harsh to assert that the author of Passage 2 has a limited understanding "of what constitutes intelligence" despite the fact that the two authors may hold different opinions on the degree to which dogs are able to reason.
Here's another question with an answer similar to this about dogs:
brainly.com/question/18951741
#SPJ4
Answer:
The fifth degree Taylor polynomial of g(x) is increasing around x=-1
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, you can do the derivative of the fifth degree Taylor polynomial, but notice that its derivative evaluated at x =-1 will give zero for all its terms except for the one of first order, so the calculation becomes simple:
and when you do its derivative:
1) the constant term renders zero,
2) the following term (term of order 1, the linear term) renders: 
since the derivative of (x+1) is one,
3) all other terms will keep at least one factor (x+1) in their derivative, and this evaluated at x = -1 will render zero
Therefore, the only term that would give you something different from zero once evaluated at x = -1 is the derivative of that linear term. and that only non-zero term is: 
as per the information given. Therefore, the function has derivative larger than zero, then it is increasing in the vicinity of x = -1
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- non-leap years: 31/365
- leap years: 31/366
Step-by-step explanation:
As a fraction of the number of days in a calendar year, it will depend on whether the year is a leap year.
non-leap years have 365 days, so 31 days is 31/365 years.
leap years have 366 days, so 31 days is 31/366 years.
_____
If you're asking for the purpose of computing interest, you need to be aware that "ordinary interest" counts 360 days in a year. 31 days would be 31/360 years. "Exact interest" counts 365 days in a year, so 31 days would be 31/365 years.
In astronomy, the definitions of "day" and "year" may vary, depending on the frame of reference and what direction in space marks the boundary of the period. The precise fraction will depend on how you define these terms and where the clock is located.
The answer is 2/3
or in decimal form: 0.6 repeated
