When using the "intimidation" tactic to detect deception, one should Select one: a. emphasize the futility and impending danger
associated with continued deceit. b. lie to the other to make them believe you have uncovered their deception. c. play down the significance of any deceptive act. d. make a "no-nonsense" accusation of the other. e. None of the above actions would be used as part of the intimidation tactic.
Bullying tactics are emotional devices that play into one's insecurities through false accusations that divert the focus of the debate. They are designed to get the public drawn to the accuser's point of view and to demonize their opponent with inconvenient truths or false accusations. In most, if not all cases, intimidation tactics are basically ad hominem attacks.
Based on this, we can say that the letter D is the correct answer to your question.
The choices inaction refer to the person's rights to protect the property that is claimed and enforced by the action and is not by making any physical possession of the physical property.
Thus has the right to recover things that is not in one's possession.
And is a common law tradition and refers to the right in the property and specifically a combined bundle of the rights. A choice describes the arrangement right that a party posses in an object.
The psychologist is likely using a psychological testing which aims to pursue an objective and standardized measure of a sample behavior. It could be seen in the example above as the psychologist made use of the personality test score to project of which client is likely to benefit more from a specific type of substance abuse treatment.
