1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jok3333 [9.3K]
3 years ago
13

Appellate judges can hear the same testimony and consider the same evidence as the trial court did in rendering a decision. Is t

his true?
Law
1 answer:
olganol [36]3 years ago
6 0
Yes it is true because they can overturn a conviction that happened in a trial court.
You might be interested in
Subject - Government
BigorU [14]
A is the correct answer I think
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I just wanted to try Brainly out and haven't used it and want my account refunded.
Ksju [112]
It’s fun , I love using it to check for the correct answers and see if anyone thinks like me
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
omeli [17]

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences, generally a life sentence, on those convicted of an offense if they have been p
alexgriva [62]

Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences,  on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses are called three-strikes law.

<h3>What is three-strikes law?</h3>

Three-strikes law, serves as the  criminal sentencing structure which is been imposed on anyone found guilty for the third violation of violent felonies.

Therefore, Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences,  on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses are called three-strikes law.

Learn more about Three-strikes law at

brainly.com/question/13881309

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Identify an example of an area of life where RULES apply and another area of lite where LAWS
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

In the family, rules are made about the right time for family members to come home.

In the society, laws are made to secure the lives and properties of people.

Explanation:

Rules are personal in nature and differ from laws because the repercussions for each of them differ. Rules are made within smaller settings such as within the family at school, or at work. Laws are the do's and don'ts of a society made by its government. The repercussions for breaking rules are personalized to the individual needs of people.

The repercussions for breaking laws are standard and hold for all persons. For example, the consequence of stealing in a state in America is the same for all persons. Rules made in schools can have different results when broken. For example, the consequence for lateness might be suspension in one school and detention in another.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which of the following areas of the workplace is an employee most likely to have a reasonable expectation of privacy?
    9·1 answer
  • When parallel parking, the space you choose to park in should be at least as long as what?
    8·2 answers
  • Directions: Summarize the main ideas of this lesson by answering the question below.
    9·1 answer
  • Nikki has a credit line of $6,000 on her credit card. Review the summary of her latest credit card statement.
    10·1 answer
  • What are some long term effects of taking a plea deal?
    12·1 answer
  • You are stopped at a multi-lane intersection, waiting for a green light. When the light turns green, the car next to you tries t
    7·1 answer
  • QUESTIONS
    12·1 answer
  • A state statute must not conflict with the U.S. Constitution. true or false
    12·2 answers
  • In a negligence case, the plaintiff must establish
    6·1 answer
  • NEED ASAP!!!
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!