Answer:
motivated blindness
Explanation:
Motivated Blindness can be defined as a systemic failure to perceive unethical conduct. The term motivated blindness was first used by Max H. Bazerman and Ann E. Tenbrunsel in their book "Blind Spots."
They define the term as a failure to see the unethical conduct of others when they know that is would not be in their best interest to notice it.
<u>In the given case, the cause of Alonzo's behavior is because of his motivated blindness. He, as a president of the student class, overlooked the unethical behavior of cheating as it was not in his best interest.</u>
So, the correct answer is Motivated Blindness.
one by one they ask and one by one they are misleaded
The crusades helped to increase trade between the Europeans and the Middle East.
The stages of development within the groups were described by Bruce Tuckman in the year of 1965. The groups must go throught these phases to reach their maximum effectiveness.
Stagew one is forming. At this stage the acceptance of the individual within the group is important. Focus will be on the fulfillment of common objectives and also on individual tasks. People know each other.
Stage two is storming, within which the group remains cordial but minimal confrontations will appear. To move on to the netx phase you must learn to handle conflicts.
Stage three is norming, individuals feel part of the group.
Performing is the final stahe where the group maintains a stage of independence and flexibility. They work together and trust them. In the latter the group has the greatest possible cohesion due to all the work done previously.
It is called jury nullification when the jury ignores the law and acquits an obviously guilty defendant.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The jury is a subordinate body of citizens that assists the judge in his decisions or give a decision that is different from the decision of the judge. This body of citizens, in certain cases, has the power that allows them to exercise jury nullification.
And, declare an obviously guilty accused as not guilty based on the personal conviction of the jury members and their own persuasion of the matter.
