Question

The following question(s) are based on the following situation: The Children at Risk (CAR) program intervenes in the lives of high-risk adolescents 11 to13 years of age who live in severely distressed neighborhoods. Harrell and her colleagues sought to answer three primaryquestions:Did CAR youths and families participate in more services and prosocial activities during the program than youths and families in the control and comparison groups? Did CAR youths and caregivers have fewer risk factors and/or protective factors than youths and caregivers in the control and comparison groups one year after the program ended? Were CAR youths less likely to exhibit problem behaviors in the year following the end of the program than high-risk youths in the control group who did not receive CAR services?The first question is an evaluation of: a. Need b. Process c. Impact d. Outcome e. Efficiency

Answer 1

Answer:

The answer is C.

Explanation:

There are different questions given about the Children At Risk (CAR) program that is given as the study. The first question which asks if the children who were in the CAR program participated in more services / prosocial activities than the ones in the control and comparison groups. This is a question that aims to evaluate the impact of the Children At Risk program on the behaviour of the children and their activities.

I hope this answer helps.

Answer 2

Answer

process ( B )

Explanation

The first question which asks " did CAR youths and families participate in more services and pro-social activities during the program than the youths and families in the control and comparison groups?" this question is to evaluate the level of participation of the adolescents between the ages of 11 to 13 years whom the program was mainly designed for hence the question is an evaluation of the process of  the program before the outcome of the activity will be evaluated eventually.