Answer:
I say the second one.
Explanation:
This is what I would put. Im so so so sorry if this turns out to be wrong, but this is still what I'd put.
Answer:
The question above represents an example of a case.
Explanation:
The question above shows an example of a case. One case is a judicial process, where a situation of discrepancy has been established between two people, two entities, or between entities and people (as shown in the question above), where it will be necessary to review laws so that a judge can make decisions around this discrepancy, allowing the injured to be compensated.
A writ of certiorari is a judicial order that instructs a lower court to send up the record in a case so that the decision can be reviewed by a higher court. This is the process by which judicial review occurs.
Answer:
Canadians - 32.32% Although all citizens of Canada are considered Canadians, many Canadians also feel that is the term that best represents their ethnicity.
Explanation:
Producers. Government subsidies are paid to the producer of the product being subsidized. A good example of this is the farm subsidy program in the U.S.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/07/02/GR2006070200024.html
Farmers (producers) are directly paid by the government to grow certain desired crops. Other groups like importers and exporters may benefit from subsidies but the key words in the question are "directly benefits." In other words, who is it receiving the subsidy money from the provider of the subsidy? The producer did.
